Why Is Coal So Dangerous

granite2 wrote:PC I guess you also believed all those peer reviewed scientists who said we were heading into a new ice age,

No that's not correct. 1970s ice age predictions were predominantly media based. The majority of peer reviewed research at the time predicted warming due to increasing CO2.

Note the reading for now it is not the peak sun time on the east coast of Aust.

granite2 wrote:

planetcare wrote:

granite2 wrote:
. Some designs don't need water for cooling, some can take old used rods from old nuclear power plants and use them until there is very little radiation left.

Can you provide some links from independent  (ie not the companies pushing SMR's) nuclear  experts to validate the above?

I can if you can provide information from a source that is not anti nuclear.

I doubt it!
"Because light water SMRs incur both this economic premium and the considerable regulatory burden associated with any nuclear reactor, we do not see a clear path forward for the United States to deploy sufficient numbers of SMRs in the electric power sector to make a significant contribution to greenhouse gas mitigation by the middle of this century."

https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/small-modular-reactors
https://reneweconomy.com.au/small-modular-reactor-rhetoric-hits-a-hurdle-62196/